Policy Report On Dispersal Of Asylum Seekers

IntroductionThe UK has been second nucleotide to bema seekers for a actually enormous time, having witnessed an inflow of immigrants since the s thusly farteenth century, near of which were looking for safe. With time, the UK residents felt fazed by increasing concentrations of social minorities in the UK and peculiarly their cluster in item beas which guide to congestion. In response to the increasing uneasiness of the universe, the goerning opted to conform to up with performer through which they could redistri thoe the pagan minorities in other(a) areas so as to decongest the cities and embolden soaking up.This led to the formulation of the Asylum and immigration travel in 1999 which led to the dissemination of ethnic minorities to divers(a) corners of the United Kingdom. The public exposure indemnity has however watch under heavy criticism with fills that it isolates the creation seekers from the renders them vulner subject to racially charged attacks. This paper therefore seeks to dismember the scattering policy of creation seekers, examining its background and show upgrowth. It get out besides polish offer as critique of the policy which will largely determine whether it is a operable policy or not.Background policy reviewPrior to the 1990s, some(prenominal) europiumans estimation of refugees as a problem of the third adult male which take to be contained by the third world. Europe would still be involved in benignity but refugees needed to remain at bottom their assume borders. When it became involved, Europe only admitted a selected few refugees and colonized them under controlled circumstances (Robinson et al 2003, p. 3). The attitude that many Europeans held towards refugees oddly those from the third world was that they were immigrants looking for economic opportunities and as such(prenominal), they did not deserve to be accorded mental home status.In the UK, the number of plenty desire c hancel was quick increasing (Robinson et al 2003, p. 4). During the post war period, Britain needed hands for economic reconstruction and since it was not able to fill these positions, it decided to turn to the commonwealth, leading to an influx of immigrants especially from Asia. thusly Britain has been multiethnic for a long time. While some of the immigrants were coming to look for fly the coop, others also started coming to Britain in search of refuge. As primeval as the s chargeteenth century, some 50,000 French Huguenots arrived in capital of the United Kingdom seeking refuge. In the 1880s, Jews also arrived in droves to look for refuge as they escaped the pogroms. Thus by the turn of the twentieth century, Britain had developed a reputation as a place of refuge (Robinson et al 2003, p.103).In 1905, an Aliens act was passed which ended this particular persona of migration but the influx of both voluntary and forced immigrants continued. Jews fleeing Nazi Germany settled in the UK, so did some Italians and Chinese immigrants. Rapid immigration led to a concentration of certain ethnic communities in particular areas such as Chinatowns and dockland black quarters. Britain used this immigrant manpower for labour repayable to local shortages (Robinson et al 2003, p.104). This evolution of ethnic quarters was a cause of fix for the public who even say hostility at the immigrants for this tenableness the recount saw the need for dispersal of refugees as comfortably as ethnic minorities even before the formulation of the dispersal policy (Robinson et al 2003, p.104).It started an informal dispersal program in which the political relation attempted to settle flock in unalike areas. Public opinion showed that many Britons were xenophobic and did not approve of the way some economic groups were clustering in the country fearing that this would possess an impact on the national identity of the British. Racial exclusion became an fit of life in many regions of the UK in the mid- sestetties to such an extent that it became a matter of familiar as well as political headache. nigh parents even objected to the number of black children who were world allowed to seem local schools. This led to the Boyles Law being passed which give tongue to that local schools should accommodate a maximum of 30% of ethnic minority children.The Department of Education and skill even suggested some policies to prevent ethnic concentrations from mental synthesis up. In the 1970s, many large number became increasingly certificatory of the dispersal of ethnic minorities. Dispersal was conceptioned at decrease the hostility say at them and facilitating their access to stop chances. It was felt that living in mixed neighbourhoods would contend the stereotypes that were associated with ethnic minorities (Robinson et al 2003, p.106-107).In 1969, the Cullingworth committee investigating public living accommodations in the UK expressed con cern over the residential concentration of ethnic minorities especially in the inner metropolis a factor that had led to overcrowding and which, they felt could lower the standards of education. For this reason, they proposed dispersal albeit voluntary. In the age that followed however, there were increased calls for the compulsory dispersal of ethnic minorities (Robinson et al 2003, p.107).In the 1970s however, the assimilation concept began to be viewed as outdated, politically incorrect and connect to a belief of ethnic supremacy. No policy makers or those in power wanted to be associated with the assimilation concept lest they be viewed as extremists (Robinson et al 2003, p.108). The development of the dispersal policy hindquarters be linked to the changing offbeat ideologies of the UK. The ideology of social state was evident especially in the years directly afterward the Second World War.This ideology prevailed in the post war period and was associated with recognition of the ask of all people including the on the job(p) class, as oppose to the bourgeois only. Thus everyone, even the immigrants who constituted the workings class, benefited from a wide range of benefit benefits. The youthful third way ideology seeks to promote benefit to work program and it has been likened to the principles of neo- liberalism. It claims to attempt to blend the principles of social democracy with neo- liberalism and involves welfare to work program whereby people must be helped by to find work by helping them overcome the dependency on passive benefits, inculcating in them a grit of responsibility.The welfare reform program consists of welfare cuts something that greatly affects the origination seekers. Government wishes to reallocate welfare payments to those who are working as opposed to those not working such as the instauration seekers. Their benefits acquit practically been abolished under this program and they have to undergo rigorous scrutiny to be eligible if at all (the drop off of social democracyn.d). The evolution of such welfare ideologies determines how initiation seekers are treated since they rely in general on welfare.Asylum seekers dispersal policyUnder the informal dispersal program prior to the 1990s, there were stories of how asylum seekers were transported to remote areas only to find that their destinations were neither expecting nor prepared for them. For this reason, many of them returned to London just a few days after having been dispersed.The asylum seekers were not very willing to be dispersed and some of consequently refused to be aid if it involved dispersing them to areas outside the capital. In response to the failed topical anaesthetic Government Association dispersal program, in 1999, the government passed the use of the Asylum and Immigration Act a new compulsory policy that radically special the reception of asylum seekers. It is worth noting that it was not mandatory for all asylum s eekers to be dispersed but those who needed financial shop at had to agree to it since the government would offer financial support only to those who were in agreement with the dispersal policy (Robinson et al 2003, p.123).The objectives of the dispersal act were to control the number of people who were seeking asylum in the UK, hasten the assessment surgical operation for asylum claims and overhaul the mechanisms of financial support for asylum seekers so that they stop coming to the UK merely for welfare benefits. Under the Act, the National Asylum Support military service (NASS) was formed. Its purpose was to choose which asylum seekers qualified for state benefits, fork out them with these benefits and disperse them from London as well as the South East (Robinson et al 2003, p.123). It would go forth asylum seekers with lodgement in some areas which came to be referred to as cluster areas under a to a greater extent centralized dispersal process.This act meant that asylum seekers were not entitled to benefits and they were subject to compulsory dispersal by NASS so as to decongest the cities (Griffiths et al, n.d). Asylum seekers would apply to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate for asylum and the Directorate would decide whether their claim was true or unfounded. Meanwhile, those who had been temporarily admitted would be forwarded to NASS who would provide them with emergency accommodation if they did not have means of supporting themselves.Within a seven day period, NASS decides who qualifies for support and disperses them to cluster areas outside London and the South East. The impoverished asylum seekers are given free housing inclusive of utilities cost and financial support. Once settled temporarily, the asylum seekers would know the fate of their claims within a two month period and could appeal within the four months that follows. The entire procedure is expected to be completed within a span of six months maximum.The Act also propo ses an integration of the relevant regimen into consortia that would be responsible for the long term integration of asylum seekers who had been granted refugee status (Robinson et al 2003, p.124). The aim of the dispersal act is to redistribute the costs of supply to the asylum seekers, diffuse social tensions and discourage ambitious appli go offts. The dispersed asylum seekers are taken oversee of and integrated into their communities by NASS which offers them accommodation within the agglomerated areas (Griffith et al, n.d).Critique of the Asylum seekers dispersal policyFrom its inception, the asylum seekers dispersal policy was met with severe criticism due to the critical issues that it raises to have-to doe with citizens as well as the perceived seek that it poses to the asylum seekers themselves. This section uses the othering opening and the critical laundry theory to examine how asylum seekers are have in the UK and other developed nations, especially those whic h have a similar policy to UKs dispersal policy.Critical race theory helps one to take the normal social situation in terms of races, racism and the subsequent game of power. The critical race theory helps in determining how the fraternity has organise itself especially along racial lines and how relationships between the races are organised in a hierarchical manner. Further more(prenominal), it strives for social evaluator and a improvement of the situation a betterment of the relationship between the races (Delgado and Stefancic 2001, p.3). Central to understanding why races tend to group themselves together is the concept of othering.Othering is an grand part of identity formation. As Dominelli (2004, p.76) puts it, the self is in existence due to the presence of the other who muckle be used to as a stones throw of comparison to oneself. This dichotomy facilitates the externalization of the other to such an extent that he or she is viewed in an unfitting manner, thus c reating hierarchical relations. In the formulation of policies therefore, othering processes devote divisions such that those who are labelled as the other are set apart from the normal population.They pass on barriers that prevent those who have been excluded from mingling with others, and distinguish them as undeserving of favourable discourse (Dominelli 2004, p.76). In the UK, asylum seekers as well as refugees are subjected to othering which makes them slowly prey for violence. For instance, almost all asylum seekers in Scotland are located in Glasgow a city rife with gangs that attack them for the ethnic minorities who are othered base on their looks, their language as well as culture. Just looking different in Glasgow can make one a victim of racial harassment on a level that has been expound as shocking by a frugal executive knowledge.The reason given by the gangs for these a great deal brutal attacks targeted at asylum seekers is that they are normally given the be st houses in the area a result of the dispersal policy which is responsible for cave in the asylum seekers in scattered places and providing them with financial support. What the gangs cannot understand is why the others should be accorded such favourable treatment when the deserving inhabitants of the regions can credibly not even afford the lifestyle accorded to the others (Stewart, 2007). According to Morris (2007) asylum seekers are put at risk by the dispersal policy which, in an effort to decongest the main cities procures the houses for asylum seekers in far off places which are always poor. That the asylum seekers are given the best housing in the area makes them targets of prejudice and violence.This main reason behind such attacks is that the residents feel that the asylum seekers are being given preferential treatment. Most of the places where the asylum seekers are settled are volatile areas that have witnessed recurrent attacks on asylum seekers. For example, both the Moston regularize and the Cheetham district in Manchester continue to receive many refugees even though they are considered to be very dangerous and unpleasant. Other dangerous areas which continue to receive asylum seekers are Everton, whose residents felt that the asylum seekers were being favoured, and Toxteth which have both witnessed some(prenominal) cases of racial harassment that are targeted at asylum seekers as well as refugees. Furthermore, some asylum seekers are dictated in areas where there is none of their kind and where they have difficulty in communication. The dispersal system thus tends to isolate foreigners, making them vulnerable to hostility.In several studies carried out in the UK and documented by the Information nitty-gritty rough Asylum and Refugees (ICAR n.d), it was established that most people were very concerned about the influx of immigrants into the UK with several of them expressing concern that immigration was out of control. Of particular conce rn was the question of asylum seekers, with most people inquire just how genuine these supposed asylum seekers were. The study found that many people were concerned about the increasing numbers of asylum seekers and how genuine their claims were. A number of people felt that the influx of asylum seekers was economically motivated.They felt that if such immigration was left over(p) unchecked, then it would eventually threaten the British society in terms of their values, health, ethnicity as well as religion. The British economy would also suffer due to the asylum seekers becoming burdens to the economy, increasing competition and spicy in acts of criminality since asylum seekers were often associated with divergence which could lead to acts of illegality. The study also revealed that most people felt that the asylum seekers were favoured and were in fact, better off than the average white Briton. Most of the problems that asylum seekers typesetters case are have either been crea ted or exacerbated by the dispersal policy since it tends to put the immigrants in places where they can be easily othered and isolates them thereby making them tractable to prejudice.ConclusionThe dispersal policy has been faced with severe criticism due to the perceived danger that it poses to the asylum seekers. separated in foreign communities and not understanding the British system, they suffer racial prejudice and violence directed at them by the locals who cannot understand why these outsiders are being treated in a more favourable manner by the government barely they are just immigrants while the locals continue to be worse off than these immigrants.The increased cases of violence directed at immigrants should sound alarm bells for the relevant governance and lead to a review of the dispersal policy. It is pivotal for nations to grant asylum to people fleeing the countries. However if this is do in a manner that puts offends the locals and puts them at risk, then the provision of asylum defeats purpose. It does not make sense for people fleeing death from their countries to be granted asylum in another, only for them to be met with the hostility that probably drove them from their countries in the first place. Thus the government should halt the dispersal policy or metamorphose it so that the asylum seekers are not primed(p) at risk.